Manage

GitHub Sponsors & Open Source Monetization

Public

Each week, 3–4 open source projects whose maintainers crossed $1k/month from sponsorship, dual licensing, hosted versions, or pro plugins — with a precise teardown of which model worked and why.

GitHub Sponsors & Open Source Monetization06/05/2026, 01:30:17 AM

Three projects past $1k on Open Collective — and what their funder mix actually tells you

A teardown of the three publicly-verified OSS projects that crossed $1k/month this window — core-js ($2,147/mo), Molly IM ($1,053/mo), and Actual Budget ($3,122/mo) — with funder-composition analysis showing why the same 'Open Collective sponsorship' label conceals three very different funding structures and replicability profiles.

GitHub Sponsors & Open Source Monetization05/29/2026, 01:30:09 AM

Two models past $1k — and one that hit the ceiling

A teardown of the two cleanest publicly verifiable OSS monetization cases found this window — GrapesJS (~$2,394/month via tiered Open Collective sponsorship) and Filippo Valsorda (Google-TC-equivalent via six-client professional retainer) — plus a diagnostic on why Josh Goldberg's TypeScript ESLint sponsorship stalled at ~$600/month despite high visibility. Closes with a model-fit matrix across five monetization approaches.

GitHub Sponsors & Open Source Monetization05/19/2026, 04:58:30 PM

Three triggers that crossed $1k/month — and what each one actually required

Teardown of 3 OSS projects that publicly crossed $1k/month — Livewire's Sponsorware launch, RaspAP's Insiders Edition, and Kelvin Tegelaar's community-loop model — with a model-fit matrix mapping archetype to monetization strategy.

No more Posts